Monday for the teams with week 0 games? Looks like 7 games for week zero (9/3 and 9/4). Seems like a longer offseason than normal but its finally over
Week 0 teams start tomorrowI think everyone is starting on Monday regardless if you have a week 0 or week 1 game. It has seemed forever, I know my son is chomping at the bit to play since his season was canceled last fall.
Not true:Week 0 teams start tomorrow
Week 1 games start 8/16
I did hear that a couple of schools practiced at 6am to beat the heat of the day.imagine some of the practices were paused due to the high heat index - but game day is approaching!!
I've never understood the rules of transferring because it has always seemed like a pick and choose type of thing. I heard when CJ Coombs transferred to DMA he had a big sit down with DIAA and had to answer a bunch of questions and then he had to wait another 2 weeks to find out if he would be allowed to play.Did the DIAA disallow some players an opportunity to play because they transferred as Seniors? I heard Dominic Sama who transferred from DMA to the Big S, as well as Alex Brown who transferred from Conrad to his district school, Dickinson (?), was denied. What's up with this?
Real crazy... Brandywine senior INTO DMA is playing.Did the DIAA disallow some players an opportunity to play because they transferred as Seniors? I heard Dominic Sama who transferred from DMA to the Big S, as well as Alex Brown who transferred from Conrad to his district school, Dickinson (?), was denied. What's up with this?
Should have brought a lawyer to the waiver hearing. Guarantee approval. If a kid is legally enrolled in a school and is in good academic standing to participate in after school activities then the association legally can't say they can't play unless they can prove the move was made for athletic advantage or illegal recruiting occurred. This has been tried by a few states supreme courts and has gone in the kids favor every time, Most notably in FloridaI've never understood the rules of transferring because it has always seemed like a pick and choose type of thing. I heard when CJ Coombs transferred to DMA he had a big sit down with DIAA and had to answer a bunch of questions and then he had to wait another 2 weeks to find out if he would be allowed to play.
Shouldn’t the burden be on DIAA to prove that there was tampering or it was done for athletic reasons?
There has to be some type of form asking why the student left the school.
What benefit would the student have going to Sallies for one year? I am assuming they are paying tuition.
Did the DIAA disallow some players an opportunity to play because they transferred as Seniors? I heard Dominic Sama who transferred from DMA to the Big S, as well as Alex Brown who transferred from Conrad to his district school, Dickinson (?), was denied. What's up with this?
In my opinion, that attitude will essentially kill high school football.I don't know if it is a good thing or a bad thing that the state of Delaware is so strict on the recruiting aspect. Thus past spring my son played with the maryland Seahawks and every practice and every game there were coaches from all over Maryland just pitching everything at him. They even went to a tournament in New Jersey and there must have been a dozen coaches there doing what they could to get him to come to school. While in Delaware it seemed that you either had to speak with a coach at a camp or contact the school directly. Like I said I see the benefits and downside from both of these scenarios, but I do think Delaware should ease up some because it might give some kids a better chance at a better education and a better shot at attending college.
I don't know if it is a good thing or a bad thing that the state of Delaware is so strict on the recruiting aspect. Thus past spring my son played with the maryland Seahawks and every practice and every game there were coaches from all over Maryland just pitching everything at him. They even went to a tournament in New Jersey and there must have been a dozen coaches there doing what they could to get him to come to school. While in Delaware it seemed that you either had to speak with a coach at a camp or contact the school directly. Like I said I see the benefits and downside from both of these scenarios, but I do think Delaware should ease up some because it might give some kids a better chance at a better education and a better shot at attending college.
I hear your point on killing high school football. I think it is very valid. But lets say a coach does not develop players or even help with the recruiting process. Maybe the coach was hired because of family/friend connections. The athlete is at a disadvantage because of his/her/they address.In my opinion, that attitude will essentially kill high school football.
Private schools and public schools in higher income districts will siphon off a lot the best players from the rest of the schools, making those schools perennially losers. Kids don't want to play for perennially losers, so those programs will start to contract until they don't have enough players to field a team anymore.
Seaford has been going down that path lately. Last year, they didn't have a JV team and could only field 16 players on Varsity, even though Seaford is bigger than both Woodbridge and Delmar. And isn't it Dickinson who always ends up forfeiting the last games of the season due to not having enough players academically eligible to play?
Eventually a lot of high schools will drop their football program if unrestricted recruiting is allowed. It's a guess as to whether or not there will be enough programs left to keep football alive.
And therein lies the rub. Do you try to maximize the opportunities for the "great" players who might get scholarships, or do you have a more "equitable" system that allows similar opportunities to everyone?I hear your point on killing high school football. I think it is very valid. But lets say a coach does not develop players or even help with the recruiting process. Maybe the coach was hired because of family/friend connections. The athlete is at a disadvantage because of his/her/they address.
Delaware is already at a significant disadvantage with the rules on coaching outside of the season.
There are a few kids who do miss out on college scholarships every year. There are so many opportunities to play at D2, D3 levels.
If the student/parents/coaches think there is a better opportunity, they should be able to choice wherever the want. There should be no postseason play for the student. It seems to me the only players that would move would be the ones who can better their chances of the scholarship.
Definitely agree that there is no perfect answer. Only bad thing with being the little state, not enough people or schools to separate like you can in Pennsylvania, Texas, and California.And therein lies the rub. Do you try to maximize the opportunities for the "great" players who might get scholarships, or do you have a more "equitable" system that allows similar opportunities to everyone?
There is no perfect answer.
My understanding is that Brown's father took a job at the school and will be one of the coaches at the school. I'm not sure if that was Dickinson or not. It appears they moved into the school district so that the father could be closer to work. If transferring to play with your dad for one last time isn't a good reason for a waiver what is? There has to be some wiggle room for things of this nature. As far as Sama, I was told, from a parent at Sals, that DMA was protesting the transfer. But I can't see that since they seemed to have so many transfers this year along with their new coach from out of state.In the Brown case was this his first transfer? You can transfer to your feeder school at anytime (even during the season) and be immediately eligible providing it was your one and only transfer and is in fact your feeder school by zip code
example: You can't transfer from your feeder to another school then transfer back and be eligible. You would then need a hardship waiver.
Yeah it is Dickinson and looks like he was at Conrad since freshman year. If he lives in Dickinson feeder then its a no brainer and he shouldn't even need a waiver. I agree this one makes no sense. I would bet as @DoItWrite said this one gets turned around.My understanding is that Brown's father took a job at the school and will be one of the coaches at the school. I'm not sure if that was Dickinson or not. It appears they moved into the school district so that the father could be closer to work. If transferring to play with your dad for one last time isn't a good reason for a waiver what is? There has to be some wiggle room for things of this nature. As far as Sama, I was told, from a parent at Sals, that DMA was protesting the transfer. But I can't see that since they seemed to have so many transfers this year along with their new coach from out of state.
That's what I'm saying. Somebody must of passed off a Board member or something. LolAm I missing something here? Is it 1992? The DIAA denied a student transfer to Dickinson?
I agree with all of the transfers going into DMA protesting seems a bit hypocritical. Plus speaking with the DMA coach he seemed blindsided by the Sama transfer but he also seemed to take it in stride but that could be all talk behind closed doors.My understanding is that Brown's father took a job at the school and will be one of the coaches at the school. I'm not sure if that was Dickinson or not. It appears they moved into the school district so that the father could be closer to work. If transferring to play with your dad for one last time isn't a good reason for a waiver what is? There has to be some wiggle room for things of this nature. As far as Sama, I was told, from a parent at Sals, that DMA was protesting the transfer. But I can't see that since they seemed to have so many transfers this year along with their new coach from out of state.