Not sure if you were referring to my post or not. I think you were so no, I'm not GREATLY mistaken. Going private/charter IS my answer to protecting my kids from what's inside our public schools. Does that mean I think there aren't bad kids, drugs, bullying, etc in private/charter schools? Of course not. Nobody thinks that nor said that.
Skyline Middle this year has seen a 600% increase in discipline this year after the redistricting. 600%!!!!! Numerous kids with ankle bracelets, kids led out in hand cuffs. In MIDDLE SCHOOL!!! Thankfully my child only has this year to deal with what was once a great school but now has been turned into a circus. So again, why would I NOT send my kids to private/charter where there are WAY LESS issues?
After having my son just finish up high school in DE, I would say you are doing absolutely what is best for your kids UD. For us the decision was Hodgson, St. G or choice to Newark or possibly Caravel. No way was he was going to Glasgow after what I saw. It was heart breaking as both the wife and I are Glasgow graduates, but we were not sending our son there no matter what. Speaking in terms of percentages, I would say that on the Hodgson football team that 30 - 50 percent of the kids were there just to avoid going to the assigned public school. It was something that many of us parents discussed through the years as we all were saddened to feel like we could not send our kids to our neighborhood schools. I don't know what the percentage is overall, but the football team was absolutely that high and while athletics maybe played a part for some, it did not factor into our decision. It was about giving our son what we thought was the best overall education. It's sad what the public schools have become...