Who in the $%#&ing hell has said that Knight was not necessary, was dispensable, or didn't matter?? Is this thing on? Am I being punked? Are you guys really so incapable of reading what is written instead of reading what you want to respond to? There are several teams that they would have lost to without Knight over the past three years. All I said was that many guys on the team contribute to each win. Little things that might not make the stat sheets. Is this recent cold snap dulling perceptions? Are some of you lizards that need to sun themselves on rocks for their brains to work properly? WTH is going on? If this is the best comprehension I can expect.....