Is it the sub par coaching at the D2 level or is it more depth at D1 level which makes the kids work harder?I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS SAME THING TO PEOPLE WHEN DISCUSSING D2!!!
RR,I can help you out some.. This is the kid that went to CA from St M.. He should make some noise in D2 this year imo. already cleared waivers
https://wwe.hudl.com/profile/5653806/Cole-Balint
I have heard some transfers from St. Frances also, but I can not find out who they are.also heard St Marks got a RB and a big lineman from St E's
I heard there is not much order over there. The teams that had coaches with little structure never seemed to reach their potential. It would be nice to see them near the top again but I am not so sure.I think Newark might be a decent test for St Marks. I have no idea what kind of coach the Newark HC is but he has a reel good player at QB to start with.. It was smart of them to join 7v7 this summer as well which they normally don't do. They have done decent this summer and from what I saw they have some decent sized athletes and the QB looks like a real good player and throws a real nice ball. He definitely has had some training on mechanics somewhere. If the QB is a threat running as well he could be tough to defend ala Taylor Reynolds but of course he doesn't have a David Grinnage to bail him out lol.. In any case I think Newark has an outside shot at being a .500 club this year and could catch a team or two napping. The HC looked into it during 7v7 and was working his guys and the guys seemed into buying in and working so we will see what they put on the field
Wow...a senior transfer to Caravel. Crazy...I can help you out some.. This is the kid that went to CA from St M.. He should make some noise in D2 this year imo. already cleared waivers
https://wwe.hudl.com/profile/5653806/Cole-Balint
The only problem is, Caravel tends to under utilize the TE position. RR knows this better than anybody.Watched him Tuesday on 7on7.....really special. I'm a little upset he chose Caravel and not my home team. Caravel will get some big boost from him.
RR,
I have heard
I have heard some transfers from St. Frances also, but I can not find out who they are.
UNDER UTILIZE THE TE POSITION IS A UNDERSTATEMENT. If he's looking to go to college as a Tight End CA offense will not show his full talent on film. Should've stayed at St. Marks with Joey Wright IMO.The only problem is, Caravel tends to under utilize the TE position. RR knows this better than anybody.
Is it the sub par coaching at the D2 level or is it more depth at D1 level which makes the kids work harder?
I feel there are a few talented coaches at the D2 level.
UNDER UTILIZE THE TE POSITION IS A UNDERSTATEMENT. If he's looking to go to college as a Tight End CA offense will not show his full talent on film. Should've stayed at St. Marks with Joey Wright IMO.
Please, let me begin by praising Gate for the effort and fairly accurate predictions I believe he has made. Now, let me state the problems. It was a problem last year and will be a problem once again this year. The free points that Charter are giving away are a joke. But that really isn't the biggest issue. There are D-II teams that don't even belong on the field. As many have said, unless you have a solution there is not a problem. The only thought I can come up with to this point would be some sort of seeded regular season scheduling. Force the top 2 or 3 teams in each conference to face off against the other top 2 or 3 teams in other conferences the next season. Thoughts?
Doesn’t matter. Kid is not a D1 athlete doesn’t have the speed. CA will use him exactly like St Marks did last year. As a TE but put him out wide on spread series to create a height mismatches. He will make his plays. On D he will play olb/de. From film he is just ok at defense at least on film. He is a long body. Reacher and grabber not really aggressive. Not putting the kid down at all just stating my observations of film. Hell I hope he sees this and it drives him to prove me wrong.
But yes Caravel does underutilized the the TE position particularly when they run wing t half the time. But it’s not Caravel per say it’s string of week offensive coordinators and it’s been a turnstle posssition. CA for the last Few years has no offensive identity. Wing t , spread, double wing, pro set etc... whatever they do they just call plays to their best player. At risk of upsetting my CA friends the offense needs a system and identity. Just saying
Is it the sub par coaching at the D2 level or is it more depth at D1 level which makes the kids work harder?
I feel there are a few talented coaches at the D2 level.
Neither and both. There is good and poor coaching at both levels competition does bred success but the culture of certain programs just draws the right kind of kid.
Up north if a kid can't get into a Sallies, Caravel, or Vo Tech (excluding Delcastle) you know where they are likely going if they are a good football player.
Red Clay = DMA or AI
Brandywine = Concord
Appo = Mtown
Christiana = They trying to get out to Colonial or Red Clay
Choice is why DE has very little parity. You can have 60-80 kids on a football team but 1 team with have 80% of those kids who have a passion for football and 20% just out there and another team with 20% passionate player and 80% of just kids coming out for team. You guess which team will win. Prime example of why Appo will probably never catch Mtown in football.
Doesn’t matter I don't think the kid is a D1 (BCS) athlete doesn’t have the speed. CA will use him exactly like St Marks did last year. As a TE but put him out wide on spread series to create a height mismatches. He will make his plays. On D he will play olb/de. From film he is just ok at defense at least on film. He is a long body. Reacher and grabber. Not putting the kid down at all just stating my observations of film. Hell I hope he sees this and it drives him to prove me wrong.
But yes Caravel does underutilized the the TE position particularly when they run wing t half the time. But it’s not Caravel per say it’s string of week offensive coordinators and it’s been a turnstile position. CA for the last Few years has no offensive identity. Wing t , spread, double wing, pro set etc... whatever they do they just call plays to their best player. At risk of upsetting my CA friends the offense needs a system and identity. Just saying
It’s kind of crazy that you have Red LionKinda wasting time (when I should be editing a podcast), but since I couldn't sleep this morning, I put together a look at each D2 team's schedule and what looks like a win, what looks like a loss and what the 8 playoff teams could be:
Diamond State Conference
1. DMA (9-1) Ls (Hodgson) Ws (St. Mark’s, Archmere, Red Lion, Milford, Charter, FSMA, Conrad, Newark, St. E) 43/10 = 4.3
2. Archmere (5-5) Ls (Dover, St. Mark’s, Caravel, DMA, St. E) Ws (Red Lion, Charter, FSMA, Tatnall, Conrad) 27/10 = 2.7
3. Conrad (6-4) Ls (DMA, Archmere, Tower Hill, Tatnall) Ws (Red Lion, Christiana, Charter, FSMA, McKean, Delcastle) 26/10 = 2.6
4. CSW (2-8) Ls (AI, Tower Hill, Friends, Archmere, DMA, Conrad, McKean, Tatnall) Ws (FSMA, Red Lion)
5. FSMA (2-7) Ls (Archmere, CSW, Conrad, DMA, Tatnall, Seaford, North East) Ws (St. Andrew’s, Red Lion)
6. Red Lion (1-9) Ls (FSMA, CSW, Archmere, Conrad, DMA, Tatnall, Christiana, Seaford, Tower Hill), Ws (St. Andrew’s)
Flight B
1. Howard (7-3) Ls (Hodgson, St. Mark’s, St. Georges) Ws (AI, Brandywine, Christiana, Dickinson, Glasgow, McKean, Mt. Pleasant) 36/10 = 3.6
2. AI (8-2) Ls (Howard, Polytech) Ws (Lake Forest, Mount Pleasant, Charter, Brandywine, McKean, Dickinson, Christiana, Glasgow) 38/10 = 3.8
3. Glasgow (6-4) Ls (Howard, AI, St. E, Caravel) Ws (Brandywine, Christiana, Dickinson, McKean, Mt. Pleasant, IR)
4. Brandywine (6-4) Ls (Laurel, AI, Howard, CR, Glasgow) Ws (McKean, Dickinson, Mt. Pleasant, Christiana, Appo)
5. Mt. Pleasant (3-7) Ls (AI, Brandywine, Glasgow, Howard, St. E, St. Mark’s, Sussex Tech) Ws (Christiana, Dickinson, McKean)
6. McKean (3-7) Ls (Conrad, AI, Howard, Glasgow, Brandywine, Mt. Pleasant, Tatnall) Ws (Charter, Christiana, Dickinson)
7. Christiana (3-7) Ls (Conrad, Brandywine, AI, Howard, Glasgow, McKean, Mt. Pleasant) Ws (Delcastle, Red Lion, Dickinson)
8. Dickinson (1-9) Ls (Howard, AI, Mt. Pleasant, Brandywine, Glasgow, Caravel, Tower Hill, McKean) Ws (Delcastle)
DII Catholic/Independent
1. Caravel (8-2) Ls (Edmonson, St. Mark’s) Ws (Archmere, Lake Forest, Silver Oak, Capitol Prep, Dickinson, Glasgow, Concord, Sussex Central) 38/10 = 3.8
2. St. Mark’s (7-3) Ls (Woodbridge, Sallies, DMA) Ws (Howard, St. E, Mt. Pleasant, Archmere, Newark, Indian River, Caravel) 37/10 = 3.7
3. St. E (4-6) Ls (DMA, Laurel, Delmar, Friends, Newark, St. Mark’s) Ws (Glasgow, Archmere, Academy of the New Church, Mt. Pleasant)
Independent Conference
1. Friends (9-1) Ls (Woodbridge) Ws (St. Andrew’s, Tatnall, Tower Hill, Lake Forest, Sidwell, Morrissville, Charter, St. E, Academy of the New Church) 41/10 = 4.1
2. Tower Hill (8-1) Ls (Friends) Ws (Conrad, Tatnall, Dickinson, George School, Red Lion, St. Andrew’s, Charter, Harford) 34/9 = 3.7777
3. Tatnall (6-4) Ls (Tower Hill, Archmere, Friends, Lake Forest) Ws (Conrad, St. Andrew’s, McKean, Red Lion, Charter, FSMA)
4. St. Andrew’s (0-8) Ls (Red Lion, George School, FSMA, Seaford, Tatnall, Tower Hill, Friends, Academy of the New Church)
Henlopen South
1. Woodbridge (10-0) Ls (0) Ws (Delmar, Milford, Laurel, Seaford, IR, Friends, Lake Forest, Dover, St. Mark’s, CSD) 47/10 = 4.7
2. Delmar (9-1) Ls (Woodbridge) Ws (Milford, Indian River, Laurel, Seaford, Lake Forest, Cape Henlopen, St. Mary’s, Arcadia, St. E) 42/10 = 4.2
3. Milford (5-5) Ls (Delmar, Woodbridge, DMA, Sussex Tech, Cape Henlopen) Ws (Seaford, Laurel, Indian River, Lake Forest, Polytech)
4. Laurel (5-5) Ls (Delmar, Woodbridge, Washington, Polytech, Milford) Ws (Seaford, Indian River, Brandywine, St. E, Lake Forest)
5. Indian River (2-8) Ls (Woodbridge, Delmar, Milford, Laurel, Glasgow, St. Mark’s, Sussex Central), Ws (Seaford, Lake Forest)
6. Lake Forest (2-8) Ls (Delmar, Woodbridge, Laurel, Friends, IR, AI, Caravel, Milford) Ws (Seaford, Tatnall)
7. Seaford (3-6) Ls (Delmar, Woodbridge, Lake Forest, Laurel, Milford, Indian River) Ws (FSMA, Red Lion, St. Andrew’s
1. Woodbridge (Henlopen South champ) 4.7
2. DMA (Diamond State Champ) 4.3
3. Delmar 4.2
4. Friends (Independent Conference champ) 4.1
5. Caravel 3.8
6. AI 3.8
7. Tower Hill 3.7777
8. Howard (Flight B champ) 3.6
----------------------
9. St. Mark’s
I think you guys are giving DMA too much credit. They don’t really have any horses outside of the Alleyne kid. I watched those guys in the 7on7 and they are truly in trouble this year.
I saw it when they warmed up at Milford last year, there were a bunch of underclassmen ready to step out.DMA typically has a very average participation number. 40 ish. This year they do have a bump at 67
Watched the Milford-Easton scrimmage. Milford looks good up front, many questions after that,Saw DMA last week. The OL is definitely smaller and need some work but still nice size D2. Skill guys are a little better than last season but QB is still a question mark. From their schedule they should still finish either 9-1 or 8-2 running through DSC with tough games being Hodgson and St. Marks.
Not sure if Milford will be a challenge for DMA Tom his year heard they joined Conrad/Brandywine scrimmage late and Milford handled Conrad fairly easily but was both Milford and Conrad were handily beating by Brandywine. Is Brandywine is up or Milford is down?
DMa did scrimmage Brandywine need to see who was there to see that.